1Initial Structure100%Y Partnership(Acquiror)ZShareholdersLLC X(Disreg. Entity)Corp Z(Target)2Merger100%PartnershipInterest in YMergeAll Assets & LiabilitiesY Partnership(Acquiror)ZShareholdersLLC X(Disreg. Entity)Corp Z(Target)3Ending PointZShareholdersY Partnership(Acquiror)LLC X(Disreg. Entity)Corp Z assets & liabilitiesmeans flow-thru for U.S. tax purposesLegendOwnership / structural holdingTransfer of stock / cash / assetsMerger step

Merger into a Partnership’s DRE Explained

The facts are the same as in Example 2 of the regulation, with one decisive difference: Y is organized as a partnership under the laws of State W and is classified as a partnership for Federal income tax purposes. In the Initial Structure, Y (the acquiror, a partnership) owns 100% of LLC X, a disregarded entity, while the Z shareholders own Corp Z, the target.

In the Merger step, Corp Z merges into LLC X under State W law. Because LLC X is disregarded, its assets are treated as owned by Y for Federal income tax purposes. All of Z’s assets and liabilities pass into X, the Z shareholders surrender their Corp Z stock, and in exchange they receive partnership interests in Y.

At the Ending Point, the former Z shareholders hold partnership interests in Y, which continues to own LLC X, and that combined entity holds the former Corp Z assets and liabilities.

The transaction does not satisfy the requirements of paragraph (b)(1)(ii)(A). All of the assets and liabilities of Z — the combining entity and sole member of the transferor unit — do not become the assets and liabilities of one or more members of a transferee unit, because neither X nor Y qualifies as a combining entity. A partnership is not a combining entity, and a disregarded entity is not a combining entity. Accordingly, the transaction cannot qualify as a statutory merger or consolidation for purposes of § 368(a)(1)(A).

Key Takeaways

A partnership is not a combining entity

Under Treas. Reg. § 1.368-2(b)(1)(iii), Example 5, a merger of a target corporation into a disregarded entity owned by a partnership fails the A reorganization requirements because neither the partnership nor its disregarded entity is a combining entity.

Compare to the corporate owner case

The identical merger qualifies when the disregarded entity is owned by a corporation (Example 2). Substituting a partnership owner for the corporate owner is what breaks the transaction — the diagram is otherwise the same.

Combining unit analysis fails

Z’s assets and liabilities must become assets and liabilities of a member of a transferee unit. With Y a partnership and X disregarded, there is no combining entity on the transferee side, so paragraph (b)(1)(ii)(A) is not met.

Result: no statutory merger

Because the requirements of § 368(a)(1)(A) are not satisfied, the exchange of Corp Z stock for partnership interests in Y is not a tax-free statutory merger and is tested under other provisions.